Journal: Journal of Arrhythmia

Article Title: Impact of magnetic fields from tablets, laptops, smartphones, and household/leisure magnets on cardiac implantable electronic devices

doi: 10.1002/joa3.70106

Figure Lengend Snippet: Parts of the evaluation of the magnetic field in the tablet, laptop, or smartphone (A); magnetic drawing board (B); magnetic alphabet toy (C); and magnetic clip (D). Figure (A) shows the iPad ninth generation. The red square, yellow circle, blue circle, and green circle indicate the accessory connection part, speaker, camera, and microphone, respectively.

Article Snippet: iPad pro 2nd generation , Apple Inc. , Neodymium.

Techniques:

Journal: Glycobiology

Article Title: A hierarchical structure in the N-glycosylation process governs the N-glycosylation output: prolonged cultivation induces glycoenzymes expression variations that are reflected in the cellular N-glycome but not in the protein and site-specific glycoprofile of CHO cells

doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwae045

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: 2 nd NormMiXTM , glyXera GmbH , STD-glyX-2ndN-APTS-100Rn-01.

Techniques: Protease Inhibitor, Labeling, Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography, Polymer

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: PN design of BD Nano™ 2nd Gen (left) and representative conventional posted-hub (right) of comparator devices. The BD Nano™ 2nd Gen PN proprietary surface geometry contains features to first concentrate pressure at the insertion site, and then distribute the applied load upon full engagement with the skin surface. Needles in posted-hub designs extend from a small diameter cylindrical feature 3-4 mm axially from the hub base (BD Nano™ shown at right).

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison Analysis for Superiority Between Means (Delta = 0.5 mm) and Variance (Adjusted for Multiple Comparisons).

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: NPD (mean ± SD) versus skin application force per device; the 0.0 y-axis value represents the skin surface. Trend of deeper initial NPD at low forces and with increasing application forces observed for PN with posted-hub designs; n value 69 to 75 per device per force level. BD NanoTM 2nd Gen hub design more closely targets 4 mm PE length across the applied force range.

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: Proportion of Injections Falling Within 4.0-4.5 mm Depth Range by Device.

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: Number of Observations (%) at Each Erythema Scoring Rank per Device Pooled Across Applied Force Levels.

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: Table Results Contain Two Separate Analyses: Contrast Multiple Comparison Using Odds Ratio for Erythema Scores (1) Pooled Across Force Levels (n per Device = 296-299, 6 Simultaneous Comparisons) and (2) Within Applied Force Levels (n per Device = 69-80, 24 Simultaneous comparisons).

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Article Title: Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection

doi: 10.1177/1932296819836987

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tissue compression following insertion of the NanoTM 2nd Gen PN (left) and posted-hub PN (right) into the tissue at a 1 lbf [4.4 N] application. In both images the orange line denotes PN hub/skin surface interface.

Article Snippet: BD Nano ™ 2nd Gen demonstrated a statistically significant higher percentage of injections within this range (41.1%), versus Device A (17.9%), Device B (3.3%), and Device C (4.7%) posted-hub devices ( , ).

Techniques: